Friday, August 18, 2006
SoaP
The verdict? Pure cinematic genius.
I'm not saying the movie is good. But it was the most entertaining event I've been to in many months. And at least 10-15% of my med school class was also in attendance. :-) At least we have fun when we can.
Thursday, August 17, 2006
Snakes on a Blog
Several of my classmates weren't interested in going to the show because they don't think the movie will be very good. To those people I say: yes, you're entirely correct. Others say that the movie didn't make the Top 10 Reviews for the coming weekend. And I say, yes, the movie wasn't even screened for critics. It's not as if there is any pretense about the film's quality. And still others just think it's strange that I'm interested ("in a cult-like way") in this film. And I have to agree with them. I don't really know why I think SoaP is so funny (although my old roommates and their relentless emails might have something to do with it). But starting another year of med school was a little bit depressing and it was nice to have something ridiculous to laugh about.
Mood: focused. On academics, not the movie. Mostly.
Song: David Gray, "Disappearing World"
Monday, August 14, 2006
Updates
Wednesday, August 09, 2006
Lieberman's Lesson
The lesson has three steps. First, say that your values reflect those of the "mainstream voters." Second, insist that anyone who disagrees with you is "out of touch" and dangerous to the country. Third, repeat as necessary.
Marshall makes another good point. It's not as if Lieberman is merely saying that he's a competent senator who might be favored by 51% of Connecticut voters in a general election. He's attacking his own (former) party for not agreeing with him, and claims that he needs to run as an Independent to save the party from itself. After all, if Joe didn't believe he was the moral barometer of the Democratic party, I'm not sure what else he would have to do.It's like a mini-version of the Iraq War or the War on Terror. You're either with Joe or you're with the extremists. Apparently half of Connecticut Democrats are outside the mainstream.
This is really the attitude that got poor Joe into this bind.
The mainstream is Joe Lieberman, along with possibly Sean Hannity and Bill Kristol. If you disagree with Joe Lieberman, a disagreement about policy is the least of it. It's a major existential crisis for the Democratic party which risks conquest by unreconstructed leftists, extremists and miscellaneous other freaks.
The idea that Ned Lamont is 'outside the mainstream' on any issue I'm aware of is laughable.
As a matter of civics, if Joe Lieberman wants to run as an independent, good for him. If 51% of Connecticut voters want to vote for him, that's democracy. As a Democrat, he should get out of the race now. And every Democrat should tell him to.
If he wants to run as an independent he should and could go to Connecticut voters and say, "A lot of people in my own party disagree with me on this or that issue. But I've served all of Connecticut's citizens for 18 years. And I still think I can be the best senator. So vote for me."
I wouldn't agree with that. But I could respect it.
But he's not. It's all about him and stabbing his own party in the back while he disingenuously pleads that he's trying to save it.
I had forgotten how much I enjoyed Josh Marshall's writing. Apparently he has an article in Time this week about the CT primary results. Good stuff.
Back to studying GI pathology...
Monday, August 07, 2006
No Turning Back!
And now it's 2:30 am. And I have class in five and a half hours. It's bedtime. Now.
But at least my plans for reunion are in motion!
Mood: cheerful
Song: David Gray, "Life in Slow Motion"
Friday, August 04, 2006
It's not that much money, really.
April 2003
"Well, in terms of the American taxpayers contribution, this is it. The rest of the rebuilding of Iraq will be done by other countries who have already made pledges, Britain, Germany, Norway, Japan, Canada, and Iraqi oil revenues, eventually, when it's up and running and there's a new government that's been democratically elected, will finish the job with their own revenues. They're going to get in $20 billion a year in oil revenues. But the American part of this will be $1.7 billion. We have no plans for any further-on funding for this."
-- Andrew Natsios, USAID Administrator
vs.
August 2006
The US has spent $437 billion on Iraq, Afghanistan, and other parts of the war on terror since 2001. The Congressional Research Service estimates conservatively that we might spend another $371 billion on these operations through 2016.
It's too bad this whole thing will cost us 475 times more than expected. So much for fiscal responsibility.
Tuesday, August 01, 2006
Hello Again
For now, though, it's back to doing what I do best: video games. Eh, strike that. Studying. Yeah, that's what I do. Something about becoming a licensed professional....
Mood: excited, jittery, optimistic, anxious, adjusting to my first caffeine jitters in over 2 months.
Song: Live, "The Beauty of Gray"